|
|
||

![]() |
In 1992, a group of science faculty at Mount Holyoke College began
meeting in a weekly seminar to discuss science topics of common
interest. Participants received modest stipends for participating
from a PEW grant the college had received for curricular development.
These seminars ran for two years. The first year we covered topics
that were inherently interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary and
of interest to several participants. The second year, a smaller
group focused primarily on issues of curricular development, which
culminated in a proposal to the Course and Curricular Development
program at the National Science Foundation, and ultimately led
to our Unity of Science course.
In the first year of the PEW Seminar, 20 faculty participated
to varying degrees. At a college with just under 200 faculty positions
(annual FTEs), of which about 40 are in mathematics and science,
this was a marvelous participation rate. Departments represented
by participants (number of faculty in parentheses) were Astronomy
(1), Biology (7), Biochemistry (1), Chemistry (3), Computer Science
(1), Geology (3), Mathematics (2), Physics (1), and Science Librarian
(1). Topics we discussed included meteorite impacts and mass extinctions,
chaos and fractals, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, modeling and
dynamical systems, and the origin of life on earth. Science issues
we discussed included what is science, what is not science, what
are the differences among disciplines, is there a hierarchy to
science disciplines, what makes a topic interdisciplinary, what
are the tools in science, and the role of mathematics in science.
These two semesters of faculty seminar were an outstanding experience
for the participants. We all learned a great deal and enjoyed
our wide-ranging pedagogical and philosophical discussions. A
typical two-hour session would begin with a discussion leader
focusing on a pre-assigned topic covered by a book or article(s)
agreed upon earlier, and the discussion would stray and meander
in completely unpredictable directions. The leader would usually
rein the group in occasionally or near the end so as to summarize
the assigned topic. The first year was specifically designed not
to lead us toward any particular curricular effort, however, we
all often felt that the synergism created by our interactions
was something we would love to be able to harness and share with
students.
The second year a subset of seminar participants continued to
meet with the explicit goal of devising one or more interdisciplinary
science courses. We had no preconceived notions of what such courses
might include, or who the target audience(s) might be. Our discussions
were generally about pedagogy and content, philosophical issues,
target audiences, learning outcomes, the pros and cons of laboratory
exercises, and the current curriculum at Mount Holyoke and elsewhere.
We explored national statistics and articles about science education.
We learned about courses and approaches being used by others,
but found no specific courses or textbooks we were interested
in adopting. And, in the end, we created the framework for the
Unity of Science course now in place. We submitted a successful
proposal to NSF, and along with substantial support from the college,
we have implemented the course and are now able to share what
we have learned and created with those who may be interested.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The ultimate creation of this course is due to a collective effort
by the faculty at Mount Holyoke College. The NSF grant proposal
that made it possible was written by Steven R. Dunn (Geology),
Tom R. Dennis (Astronomy), Susan Barry (Biology/Neuroscience),
Frank J. DeToma (Biology/Biochemistry), Sandra N. Ward (Science
Librarian). The specific content and methodology of the course
was shaped in profound ways by the aforementioned and by Mary
K. Campbell (Chemistry), W. Donald Cotter (Chemistry), Katherine
Dorfman (Director of Laboratories), Rachel Fink (Biology), Mark
A.S. McMenamin (Geology), Samuel Mitchell (Philosophy), Donal
O'Shea (Mathematics), Curtis Smith (Biology/Biophysics), and Stan
Rachootin (Biology). Other seminar participants and contributors
include George Cobb (Mathematics and Statistics), Paul Dobosh
(Computer Science), John Durso (Physics), Claude Fennema (Computer
Science), Aaron Ellison (Biology and Environmental Studies), Edward
Fitzgerald (Chemistry), Anna Harrison (Chemistry), Lilian Hsu
(Biochemistry), Mark Peterson (Physics and Mathematics), Margaret
Robinson (Mathematics), Lauret Savoy (Geology), and Elsbeth Walker
(Biology). Other contributors to whom we wish to express our sincere
gratitude include Joseph Cohen (Psychology), Lynn Morgan (Anthropology),
and Thomas Millette (Geography). The Unity of Science course was
funded in part by the National Science Foundation (DUE-9455682).
![]()
Home | MyMHC | Web Email | Directories | SiteMap | Search | Help
Admission |
Academics |
Campus Life |
Athletics Copyright © 1999 Mount Holyoke College. This page created by Unity of Science and maintained by Katherine Dorfman and Patricia Blomgren. Last modified on September 6, 1999. |