At first glance, the 4 Gas Giants appear very similar in many ways.
In other ways, however, they are quite different. An analogy is to a
family of 4 siblings -- each have similarities, but often the
differences are striking, and have to do with genetic makeup as well as
environmental factors such as birth order. I hope this material can
help to convince you that the differences in the Gas Planets are rooted
in how and where they formed. These planets comprise 99.5% of the
planetary mass in our solar system -- understanding them is intimately
linked to the understanding of how they formed.
II. Composition in Context
Summary of formation
Condensation likely between 100-200 K
Outside "frost line" ~170 K -- mostly ices, some silicates
Nucleus accretes to about 5 Mearth
Nebular gas is attracted to this core -- forms thick envelope
Later accreting planetesimals dissolve in the atmosphere
"ices" (as Darby said) can be methane, ammonia, not just water
Composition with respect to solar nebula/primitive atmosphere
when we say "solar" composition, that is solar nebula (before fusion)
H 71%
He 27%
2% "condensable" -- C, N, O (in water, ammonia, methane, rock)
Figure 14.3 from text: rock/water/H/He planets
Retention of primitive atmosphere
escape velocity is ~60 km/s (sqrt(2 G M/R))
mean molecular weight is 2.3, so Vmean = sqrt(3kT/m) ~= 0.133 km/s