|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Excerpt from Standard
Techniques for Presentation and Analysis of Crater Size-Frequency Data
|
|
NASA Technical Memorandum 79730, by
the Crater Analysis Techniques Working Group.
|
|
Crater statistical analyses have been used successfully in three major ways, namely : (1) to understand planetary chronologies and to date geologic units and events, (2) to identify surface and subsurface processes, and (3) to provide a framework for interpretation of data from other fields.
Dating of planetary surfaces was one of the first applications of crater statistics. Through detailed study of crater size-frequency, density, and morphology [shape} distributions, reliable relative chronologies are being established for the Moon, Mars, and Mercury. [Crater counts were the first evidence to suggest that Venus has undergone catastrophic resurfacing.] For the Moon, where Apollo and Luna returned samples are available, Moon-wide absolute chronologies have been developed and are being extended across the surface. Many sub-disciplines of planetology require at least a framework of relative ages in order to interpret planetary evolution in terms of chemistry, structure, and processes; crater analyses are the chief means of obtaining this time framework. When combined with asteroid and comet surveys, crater statistics provide the only presently available means of establishing absolute (admittedly coarse) chronologies for Mercury, Venus, and Mars. Crater analyses have established the generally ancient nature of the surfaces of the Moon, Mercury, and Mars, thereby demonstrating the uniqueness of the Earth's rapid tectonic cycle of crustal production, evolution, and destruction. Lunar crater statistics and returned sample ages are combined to establish tat the impact flux in the Earth-Moon system has been highly time-dependent with an early high flux that dropped rapidly to a level several orders of magnitude lower, with possible episodic excursion back to higher levels...
Because impact craters form at random locations on planetary surfaces, but geologic events often locally alter this uniformity, crater analyses have been useful for mapping geologic units of common origin and age. Furthermore, different geologic processes (e.g., aeolian [wind] erosion, volcanism, and tectonic disruption) affect crater size-frequency distributions and morphologies in characteristics manners. Through crater analyses a wide range of internal and surface geologic processes have been identified or contrasted on the Moon, Mercury, and Mars.
Crater analyses already have produced valuable and otherwise unattainable information, and the prospects for still further successes are excellent. Current competition and debate are producing rapid advancements and refinements of our understanding of cratering as a geologic process; recognition of the characteristics of primary and secondary cratering; understanding of the origin, evolution, and dynamics of small bodies in the solar system; and understanding of planetary crustal properties, environments, and evolution. As the techniques of crater analysis continue to expand the library of basic information about the terrestrial planets, their use and respect by other disciplines will continue to grow. |
|
Home | Syllabus
| Course Schedule | Images
and Data | Homework | Homework
Answers |
|
This page was created by Darby
Dyar and is maintained by Darby Dyar and Rebekah Robson-May.
Last updated on 19 April, 2002. |