Galileo claimed that the path of the ball is a parabola.
His reason for thinking so is very ingenious. He imagined
that the curve we see is just the combination of two
simpler motions. The horizontal motion of the ball is
neither increased or diminished by gravity, so it stays
constant. Thus the ball passes the observers, who are regularly
spaced, at equal intervals, like the ticks of a clock.
Tick tick tick tick tick!
Now what about the vertical motion? This is just simple
falling, and we know how that works: 1, 4, 9, 16, etc.
It is uniformly accelerated motion. To test this idea
experimentally, we have to see if the y-values are
proportional to the x-values SQUARED. This is easy
to do. We just square the x values -- which we can represent
as the third column in the table that already has a column
for x and a column for y -- and then we plot the y versus
the x2. If they are proportional, then the
points will fall on a straight line. Notice that the way
we are measuring, the point (0,0) is the first point. If
you don't choose to measure things from the beginning of the
horizontally projected trajectory, then everything gets more
complicated to describe, needlessly so.
The graph might look something like the one below.
You should also try this with a projected rolling object on a ramp. It can be as simple as a wet ball-bearing on a paper towel. The wet track left behind can be analyzed just like the trajectory above. Once again you should measure everything from the highest point of the trajectory, the same point that we called (0,0) in the first figure (upper left corner of that figure).