Economic Position and Officeholding, 1752-1789


In these communities, officeholding was not monopolized by an oligarchy of wealthy residents.  To the contrary:

  • Officeholding was widely shared among male heads of households who routinely rotated through different offices.

In Tart-le-Bas (Table 1), for example, of the 88 men we can identify and who were eligible to serve from 1752 to 1789, three quarters of them held a village office at least once during this period.  In neighboring Tart-le-Haut, of the 141 men so identified, 57 percent held at least one office in these years.

  • In sum, annual elections with the high degree of rotation in and out of village offices meant that 45 to 80 percent of the male heads of household held office at least once during the period.

Table 1: Tart-le-Bas

Number of Village Offices Held

State Tax Category (in sous)

None

One

Two or Three

Four or More

Total

<200

4

5

2

0

11

 

17.4%

26.3%

10.5%

0.0%

12.5%

200-600

15

12

14

24

65

 

65.2%

63.2%

73.7%

88.9%

73.9%

600+

4

2

3

3

12

 

17.4%

10.5%

15.8%

11.1%

13.6%%

Totals

23

19

19

27

88

 

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Total Row Percent

26.1%

21.6%

21.6%

30.7%

100%

           

Table 2: Tart-le-Haut

Number of Village Offices Held

State Tax Category (in sous)

None

One

Two or Three

Four or More

Total

<200

28

6

3

0

37

 

46.7%

20.7%

10.3%

0.0%

26.2%

200-600

26

21

21

16

84

 

43.3%

72.4%

72.4%

69.6%

59.6%

600+

6

2

5

7

20

 

10.0%

6.9%

17.2%

30.4%

14.2%

Totals

60

29

29

23

141

 

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Total Row Percent

42.6%

20.6%

20.6%

16.3%

100%

           

 

  • The principle of rotation also meant that the proportion of men called to office was greater in smaller communities than in larger ones, as we can see by comparing Tables 3 and 4. In the tiny village of Tart l'Abbaye, 80 percent of the 67 identified men held at least one office, whereas in the larger Longecourt, where the same number of offices were apportioned among more than twice as many men (155), 45 percent were called  to a village office at least once during these decades.

 

Table 3: Tart l’Abbaye

Number of Village Offices Held

State Tax Category (in sous)

None

One

Two or Three

Four or More

Total

<200

6

3

4

1

14

 

46.2%

23.1%

28.6%

3.7%

20.9%

200-600

7

9

10

17

43

 

53.8%

69.2%

71.4%

63.0%

64.2%

600+

0

1

0

9

10

 

0.0%

7.7%

0.0%

33.3%

14.9%

Totals

13

13

14

27

67

 

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Total Row Percent

19.4%

19.4%

20.9%

40.3%

100%

           

Table 4: Longecourt

Number of Village Offices Held

State Tax Category  (in sous)

None

One

Two or Three

Four or More

Total

<200

26

3

3

0

32

 

30.6%

12.5%

12.0%

0.0%

20.6%

200-600

45

15

18

11

89

 

52.9%

62.5%

72.0%

52.4%

57.4%

600+

14

6

4

10

34

 

16.5%

25.0%

16.0%

47.6%

21.9%

Totals

85

24

25

21

155

 

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Total Row Percent

54.8%

15.5%

16.1%

13.6%

100%

           

 

  • Not surprisingly, the poorest men were very rarely called to office, and the likelihood of holding office one or more times typically increased as one moved up the social ladder.

In Thenissey, for instance, the men whose incomes placed them in the highest tax category were over-represented among those holding office four or more times.  As column totals in Table 5 shows, they made up 20 percent of men all the men classified by tax category, but comprised 40 percent of those who held office four or more times. With the exception of Tart-le-Bas, this pattern held true in the other villages, too. And in all the communities without exception, men with the lowest economic standing were consistently under-represented among those who held office.

Table 5: Thenissey

Number of Village Offices Held

State Tax Category (in sous)

None

One

Two or Three

Four or More

Total

<200

35

6

5

3

49

 

59.3%

25.0%

19.2%

13.0%

37.1%

200-600

21

13

12

11

57

 

35.6%

54.2%

46.2%

47.8%

43.2%

600+

3

5

9

9

26

 

5.1%

20.8%

34.6%

39.3%

19.7%

Totals

59

24

26

23

132

 

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Total Row Percent

44.7%

18.2%

19.7%

17.4%

100%

           

 

Back ] Next ]Officholding ] [ Tables ] Conclusion ]


Home ] Edmond Rétif ] Edme Goes to Paris ] Adieu to Paris, Duty Calls at Home ] Edme in Sacy ] Nicolas, son of Edme ] Nicolas in Paris ] Well Governed Family ] Village Governance ]