Village Governance: Governed like the Republics of Old?

 

In the private realm of the family, Edme's patriarchal governance resembled that of the well-loved, enlightened monarch. Guided by reason and a good heart--in true Rousseauian fashion--his rule over wife, children, and servants was as a worthy example for imitation.

In the public spere of politics, the patriarchal tradition was melded not with monarchical but with republican forms. Sacy, he wrote approvingly, "resembled in many respects the Republics of Old.”

. . . it is governed like a large family; everything is decided by a plurality of votes in the assemblies which are held in the public square on Sundays and holidays after the masse and which are summoned by the sound of the great bell. It is these assemblies that elect the syndics, whose functions resemble closely those of the consuls of the Romans, the tax collectors, the field warders for the security of the cultivated land and the vines, and finally the communal shepherd. (pp. 103)

What should we make of this description of Sacy's village government? Was it as participatory or as "democratic" as suggested here?

Or was the claimed republicanism a fabrication? A hopeful fabrication in a novel that, after all, was devoted to celebrating rustic virtues?

thm_Village Politics.sharp.jpg (11557 bytes)

Village Politics
(Engraving by Jazet, 1820)

There are ample reasons for believing that poetic license and literary imitation were clearly at work.

  • The claim that Sacy resembled an ancient republic followed the example of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Although the two never met, Restif found in the great philosophe a guiding light and source of inspiration, a man of humble origins--like the author himself--whose brilliant writings brought deserved fame.  Decades before Restif set pen to paper, Rousseau, the proponent of modern democracy in the Social Contract (1762), paid hommage to his native Geneva by portraying it as a virtuous republic.   This was the Geneva of Rousseau's hopeful imagination, for, in reality, it was an oligarchy dominated by a few burgher clans. In imitation of Rousseau, the famous "Citizen of Geneva," Restif portrayed Sacy as a village where the solid virtures of Sparta or Republican Rome were still alive.
  • Restif was also following intellectual fashion.  Rousseau was but one of a growing number of writers and artists who shared a renewed interest in ancient Sparta, Republican Rome, and the idea of republic generally. This enthusiasm was part of the critical spirit of the Enlightenment and served as a challenge to despotism.   Talk of classical republics was "in the air" of Paris and circulated readily in the print shops where Restif worked as a proofreader.  An ardent borrower, Restif absorbed all this and gave it expression in his works.

In addition, the political arrangements everywhere favored the rule by one or the few over the many.

  • In monarchical France, it was an era of aristocratic domination.
  • And in the rural Burgundy of Sacy and other villages, the system of seigneurial lordship, which was stronger there than in other regions of kingdom, buttressed aristocratic power.

Officholding ] Tables ] Conclusion ]