Throughout
much of the nineteenth and just into the twentieth
centuries, the home was considered women’s
domain. Women were defined according to their
reproductive roles as mothers and “being
at home was the first essential step in becoming
successful” in this position (27).
Feminist writer and women’s rights activist,
Ida Tarbell, wrote that “for the normal
woman the fulfillment of life is the making
of the thing we best describe as home”
where she cared for her family and received
guests from her social circle
(26). Society
in the Victorian and later Edwardian eras stressed
the idea that women belonged in a domestic atmosphere
as a performance of the duty of their sex.
As
it was believed that women’s lives should
revolve around the home and family, if women
began to look for roles outside the home, or
at least roles less devoted solely to the domestic
sphere, society would resist this shift. Education
played a large part in instigating this change
of focus. Tarbell claimed that higher education
led women to acquire “an intuition of
truth akin to inspiration,” a competitiveness
that only men were supposed to possess (26;
27). However,
such women who aspired to life beyond the domestic,
risked society regarding her “as one who
shirked the task of life,” motherhood
(26).
This same resistance towards motivated female
minds was one of the factors that served as
an impetus behind the construction of the ‘cottage
system’ at women’s colleges, including
Mt. Holyoke, in the late nineteenth century.
For it was feared that the seminary system at
Mt. Holyoke had failed to preserve students’
femininity in a domestic atmosphere, but left
them “affected, unsocial“ with “visionary
notions“. College historian, Helen Horowitz,
says that the single large dwelling and separation
from family contributed to pupils “developing
an autonomous life, unregulated by authorities,”
thus less like a family and not the domestic
atmosphere the architects of the seminary system
hoped to preserve (4).
The
idea of women being relegated to the domestic
sphere prevailed throughout the nineteenth century.
This was also the time when Mt.
Holyoke Seminary expanded its single-building
system and added or made a point of maintaining
architectural
details of the building that made it appear
more domestic. Likewise, ideas regarding women’s
domesticity continued into the 1890s and 1900s
with the Edwardian era and the construction
of dormitories in the ‘Cottage
System’ at the newly re-titled, Mount
Holyoke College.