|
The World System and the Biological Old Regime, 1400-1750 |
|
|
History as Interpretation |
Retrospective vs. Prospective |
|
|
Roberts, The History of Europe, introduction to Book 3, chapter 1, “The New Age,” offers an example of the retrospective approach: he notes forces and developments taking root that will lead eventually to great change in Europe and European dominance of the world in the 19th century. In other words, he’s looking back from the present to identify the origins of the modern world. He selects those historical characteristics that will become dominant; in so doing, he gives little or no attention to aspects of the early modern period (1500-1750) that were very important in the 1500s but much less important later, such as religion, predominance of agriculture, etc. |
|
|
Robert Marks, The Origins of the Modern World. A Global and Ecological Narrative, is also, as the title makes clear, interested in the origins of our world today. But, his first two chapters emphasize the world as it was in the 1400s. He chooses a prospective approach therefore, one that looks at the 1400s and notes the differences between then and now. Not Europe but China and Asia were the great economic regions of the world at the time. He want to “read” history forward and thus makes a differing selection of topics and developments to describe, as compared to Roberts
|
|
|
Key Concepts in writing a non-Eurocentric narrative history
|
|
|
Material Conditions and the biological old regime ca. 1350-1600
|
|
|
Population Growth and Land Transformation from the 1400s: A major ecological and environmental shift. Expanding frontiers of agriculture.
|
|
|
The polycentric “World System,” ca. 1400-1750
|
|
|
Changes introduced with European overseas exploration from ca. 1415 “Armed trading in the India Ocean and Sea of China” after the overseas route discovered in 1497. Up to then, Marks suggests, economic links in the India Ocean were mainly peaceful.
|
|
|
|