The 18th
Century Enlightenment: A Reassessment of Civilization, a Shift in Conceptions
of Human Nature and Nature
|
|
Human Nature |
Nature |
Amerindian |
|
17th
century Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pensees. 1660 |
Human nature was a cluster of fixed, rather negative ingredients: Mankind was restless, self-deceiving, wretched |
Francis Bacon: a mixture of mystery and threatening force; natural philosophers like Bacon sought to control and dominate. |
part of nature, therefore brutish and uncivilized. |
|
John Locke (1632-1704), Essay Concerning Human Understanding , 1690; Some Thoughts Concerning Education, 1693 |
Human nature not fixed but malleable and plastic; shaped by environment. Mankind good or evil because of “education” broadly defined. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18th
century Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences, 1749; Discourse on the Origins and Foundations of Inequality, 1755 |
Human nature endowed with an innate sense of compassion prior to reason; hence mankind naturally good. Social life and society corrupts this nature. |
Nature seen as a living system of which humans are a part and not apart; Nature deemed “good” as opposed to artifice and superficial appearances. To be in harmony with Nature is considered a moral good. |
part of nature, therefore uncorrupted, natural, and noble. |
Newton
Montesquieu
Mary Astell
Francoise
Graffigny
Voltaire
Lessing
Adam Smith
Becarria
James Cook
Bougainville
Diderot
Herder
Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797), Vindication of the Rights of Woman 1792
![]() |
![]() |

