Lab Exercise

 

Measuring Migration from 1851 to 1861: Distribution, Center and Spread

 

 

 

            The purpose of this exercise is twofold: to gain understanding of the statistical concepts of distribution, center, and spread; and to familiarize yourself with two variables that measure migration.  In this exercise, use the data in the attached spreadsheet on migration from 1851 to 1861 for selected census registration districts of England and Wales.

 

1.      Create a dot plot.  On a piece of graph paper, create a display that shows the distribution of values for the variable "Total Migration" for the decade 1851-1861. Start by drawing a line that encompasses the minimum and maximum values. Then place dots on the line to indicate the positions of each value in the distribution. Your line should look something like this, with a zero near the center to permit your plotting of positive and negative values and a proper label.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Minimum                                                        0                                                              Maximum

 

Dot Plot of Total Migration 1851-1861

 

Recall the definition of this variable: for each census Registration District, the change in population from 1851 to 1861 that is attributable to migration.  Negative values indicate a decline in the size of the population due to (out) migration; positive values, an increase due to (in) migration.

 

2.      Briefly describe the distribution of values for each variable.  What is the range of the distribution, i.e., the difference between the maximum and the minimum? Are the values spread out evenly? Do they cluster?

3.      In a sentence or two describe what you think your plot indicates about the pattern of migration during the decade 1851 to 1861.

4.      Create a table showing the Center and Range of the distribution you just studied. Calculate the mean, the median, and the range for the same variable, i.e., "Total Migration" for the decade 1851-1861 among your sample of districts

 

 

Decade

Mean

Median

Range

1851-1861

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.      What do these measures indicate about the distribution and change of the population in your sample districts that was due to migration?

6.      Are the mean and the median similar or different? If different, what is it about the distribution that accounts for the difference?

7.      If the mean and median are different, which statistic would you use to indicate the "average" or "central" value of this distribution? Why?  (Hint: consider the effect of extreme values.)

8.      Using the statistic you selected in b), write a sentence or two that describes what the "average" or "central" value and the range indicate about the pattern of migration for the decade 1851-1861.

 

Standardization: From Counts to Ratios/Rates

 

9.      Counts. Return to your dot plot showing the distribution of total migration from 1851 to 1861.  This variable is records the number of individuals who were added or subtracted from the population in 1851 by means of migration into or out of a district.  It measures this change by recording counts of individuals.

Place this plot of counts next to the spreadsheet that contains all the sample data.  Choose one of the larger values on the dot plot; then locate on the spread sheet the registration district which has this value. Now, compare the value of Total Migration with the Total Population in 1851. Repeat this comparison for at least five values of differing size.

 

10.   What, if any, pattern seems to emerge from this comparison? Do the large values of Total Migration tend to correspond with large values of Total Population? Or do the large values of Total Migration tend to correspond with small values of Total Population?

11.   On the basis of this inspection describe in a sentence or two the limitations of using the count variable Total Migration to compare and gauge migratory movements across your sample of Registration Districts.

 

12.  Rates or Ratios.  For each Registration District in your sample, calculate the percentage change in population due to migration from 1851 to 1861. [(Total Migration/Total Population in 1851) x 100].  This new variable records a rate or percentage based on the change due to migration in relation to the size of the population at the beginning of the decade of observation.  As you discovered above there is considerable variation among the sample Registration Districts in terms of their population size in 1851.  This variation makes it difficult to make a judgement about the significance of any given population change due to migration because it's more than likely that districts with small beginning populations will go hand in hand with small changes due to migration, while the opposite is likely for districts with large beginning populations.  The use of percentages has the effect of creating values which are measured by the same "yard stick" or "standard," which for each district is the size of its population in 1851.

 

Study the percentage values that you've calculated and explain in a sentence or two why the conversion of counts to rates/ratios (percentages in this case) facilitates your ability to compare and gauge migratory movements across the Registration Districts in your sample.

 

13.  Create a dot plot showing the distribution of the new variable that you've created above: the percentage change in population due to migration from 1851 to 1861.

 

14.  Compare this dot plot with the dot plot of the count variable Total Migration which you constructed in step 1. Describe the pattern you see in the distribution of the percentage change due to migration.

15.  Explain why the variable measuring the percentage change due to migration facilitates the task of comparing and measuring variations in migratory movements across census Registrations Districts.



 

With the exception of the density of rail coverage, these data are courtesy of Professor Humphrey Southall and Ian Cameron of the Geography Department at Queen Mary and Westfield College, London.  The comprise a small sample of data from the Great Britain Historical Data Base.

 

 

 

 

Migration

Changes in Population Segment due to Migration

Density of Rail Coverage

[Kilometers of rail lines per square kilometer of area]

District

County

Start

Date of Decade

Total

Pop. at

Decade Start

Total

Female

 

Total

Male

 

Total

Percent Change due to Migration

Females

15-24

Females

25-34

Females

45-54

Males

15-24

Males

25-34

Males

35-44

 

1845

 

1854

 

1876

 

1914

 

Alton

Hampshire

1851

13360

-446

22

-424

-3.17

-55

-32.8

1

-5

71.3

-34

 

4

61

161

 

Alton

Hampshire

1861

14724

-697

-1193

-1890

-12.84

-103

-45

-75

-532

-295.5

-39

 

4

61

161

 

Alton

Hampshire

1871

14999

-865

-1037

-1902

-12.68

-207

-40.5

-10

-397

-100

-65

 

4

61

161

 

Alton

Hampshire

1881

15198

-947

-936

-1883

-12.39

-154

0

-14

-371

8.5

-33

 

4

61

161

 

Alton

Hampshire

1891

15146

-232

-322

-554

-3.66

87

42.5

-1

-153

121

19

 

4

61

161

 

Alton

Hampshire

1901

16345

577

3994

4571

27.97

436

203

1

882

430

27

 

4

61

161

 

Barton Upon Irwell

Lancashire

1851

31585

1610

78

1688

5.34

217

129

49

-116

55.5

27

82

174

328

547

 

Barton Upon Irwell

Lancashire

1861

39038

2716

1505

4221

10.81

437

246

60

433

350.5

67

82

174

328

547

 

Barton Upon Irwell

Lancashire

1871

51571

4715

3451

8166

15.83

852

577

307

1009

745

160

82

174

328

547

 

Barton Upon Irwell

Lancashire

1881

72815

2881

3549

6430

8.83

479

71.5

47

1226

852

71

82

174

328

547

 

Barton Upon Irwell

Lancashire

1891

93470

4152

2358

6510

6.96

1308

277

41

840

500.5

-84

82

174

328

547

 

Barton Upon Irwell

Lancashire

1901

114773

5281

4321

9602

8.37

1775

684.5

109

1465

1260.5

-31

82

174

328

547

 

Bootle

Cumberland

1851

5973

-311

-399

-710

-11.89

-118

-40.7

0

-197

-48.2

-35

 

62

90

90

 

Bootle

Cumberland

1861

5846

386

702

1088

18.61

74

77.7

43

148

155.2

36

 

62

90

90

 

Bootle

Cumberland

1871

8475

563

628

1191

14.05

191

100.1

26

175

66.2

34

 

62

90

90

 

Bootle

Cumberland

1881

12154

32

-156

-124

-1.02

16

28.1

15

-148

-82.4

-4

 

62

90

90

 

Bootle

Cumberland

1891

14790

-631

-655

-1286

-8.70

-89

-63.4

-43

-276

-72.4

-4

 

62

90

90

 

Bootle

Cumberland

1901

15800

-1395

-1787

-3182

-20.14

-398

-231

-84

-636

-322

-113

 

62

90

90

 

Haltwhistle

Northumberland

1851

7286

-459

-821

-1280

-17.57

-144

-71.5

-7

-198

-261

-40

45

90

90

90

 

Haltwhistle

Northumberland

1861

6693

-186

-373

-559

-8.35

-97

-24

4

-114

-67.5

-2

45

90

90

90

 

Haltwhistle

Northumberland

1871

6987

-159

-68

-227

-3.25

-62

17.5

-20

-33

4.5

-21

45

90

90

90

 

Haltwhistle

Northumberland

1881

7902

-363

-451

-814

-10.30

-142

-59

-34

-196

-70.5

-17

45

90

90

90

 

Haltwhistle

Northumberland

1891

7746

-198

-171

-369

-4.76

-50

-44.5

-32

-34

-1.5

-19

45

90

90

90

 

Haltwhistle

Northumberland

1901

4789

-400

-436

-836

-17.46

-104

-50.5

-16

-161

-74.5

-29

45

90

90

90

 

Haslingden

Lancashire

1851

52822

4411

3143

7554

14.30

728

525.8

188

329

489.0

177

 

108

108

167

 

Haslingden

Lancashire

1861

72166

732

-826

-94

-0.13

-421

-52.0

-129

-842

-297.7

-132

 

108

108

167

 

Haslingden

Lancashire

1871

83049

1342

246

1588

1.91

-22

-109.6

-74

-288

-43.8

-41

 

108

108

167

 

Haslingden

Lancashire

1881

98184

-1245

-2123

-3368

-3.43

-641

-602.4

-201

-842

-426.2

-239

 

108

108

167

 

Haslingden

Lancashire

1891

105777

220

-349

-129

-0.12

-160

-386.5

-143

-362

-131.5

-79

 

108

108

167

 

Haslingden

Lancashire

1901

115223

-2356

-2567

-4923

-4.27

-760

-1081.5

-391

-815

-722

-298

 

108

108

167

 

Hatfield

Hertfordshire

1851

8499

-458

-630

-1088

-12.80

-36

-120

-40

-342

-74.5

-13

 

80

214

214

 

Hatfield

Hertfordshire

1861

8400

-369

-466

-835

-9.94

-14

-79

-36

-150

-34.5

-18

 

80

214

214

 

Hatfield

Hertfordshire

1871

8631

-504

-529

-1033

-11.97

-48

-59.5

-44

-139

-46

-37

 

80

214

214

 

Hatfield

Hertfordshire

1881

8802

-354

-340

-694

-7.88

9

-54.5

-49

-93

-44.5

-29

 

80

214

214

 

Hatfield

Hertfordshire

1891

9309

-394

-436

-830

-8.92

48

-26.5

-76

-92

-38.5

-36

 

80

214

214

 

Hatfield

Hertfordshire

1901

9816

-82

-84

-166

-1.69

83

2.5

-23

14

67.5

-30

 

80

214

214

 

Knaresborough

West Riding

1851

9826

2443

1983

4426

45.04

546

432.9

257

408

427.0

265

 

364

177

177

 

Knaresborough

West Riding

1861

17176

211

-199

12

0.07

-28

-15.5

40

-157

-13.5

-7

 

364

177

177

 

Knaresborough

West Riding

1871

19088

897

-115

782

4.10

15

122

82

-117

68

27

 

364

177

177

 

Knaresborough

West Riding

1881

22635

1479

160

1639

7.24

108

129

112

12

125

95

 

364

177

177

 

Knaresborough

West Riding

1891

27158

4926

3484

8410

30.97

1111

526.5

367

970

683.5

332

 

364

177

177

 

Knaresborough

West Riding

1901

40504

2500

-106

2394

5.91

197

-71.5

193

-241

75

124

 

364

177

177

 

Lexden

Essex

1851

22429

-848

-1321

-2169

-9.67

-187

-60.7

-23

-420

-69.8

-37

55

85

103

137

 

Lexden

Essex

1861

23678

-1283

-1510

-2793

-11.80

-240

-89.8

-72

-450

-76.1

3

55

85

103

137

 

Lexden

Essex

1871

24734

-2744

-2413

-5157

-20.85

-537

-333.1

-234

-703

-142.6

-127

55

85

103

137

 

Lexden

Essex

1881

21775

-1292

-1314

-2606

-11.97

-175

-80

-69

-431

-9.5

-40

55

85

103

137

 

Lexden

Essex

1891

21590

-1132

-1466

-2598

-12.03

-135

-49.5

-75

-535

-45.5

-52

55

85

103

137

 

Lexden

Essex

1901

21146

-740

-588

-1328

-6.28

-48

121

-63

-283

147.5

-48

55

85

103

137

 

Newton Abbot

Devon

1851

52306

867

-1157

-290

-0.55