|
Davis
Cites American Prison System as Threat to Democracy
In a scathing critique of Americas prison industrial complex,
activist Angela Davis asked hundreds of students and faculty gathered
at Mount Holyoke last Friday to consider the social implications of
the countrys punishment industry. We face a
vast threat to the democratic future of this country, she warned,
citing as indications the high percentage of convicts from poor and
minority communities, prison voting restrictions, and the lack of adequate
prison health care. Highlighting the plight of incarcerated women, Davis
noted the prison systems disregard for parent-child relationships
and the family unit. Her consciousness-raising talk inspired two standing
ovations from the notably diverse college audience. Following her remarks,
the former political prisoner, scholar, writer, and teacher entertained
questions and signed books. Introduced by MHCs Michelle Stephens, assistant professor of
English, Davis opened with remarks on the monopolization
of the countrys two-party political system and criticized presidential
candidate George W. Bush for his machinery of death policies
in the state of Texas. Former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Colin Powell, she said, had joined Bush in making appeals to the
worst and most masculine militarism. Expressing little admiration
for Democratic candidate Al Gore, Davis suggested that Ralph Nader was
doing much better, but needs to address more specific matters of race. Davis, who first came to national attention in 1969 when she faced
off with then-Governor Ronald Reagan over her political activities
and membership in the Black Panther and Communist parties, briefly remarked
on her work to free Black Panther political prisoners and her own imprisonment
(for sixteen months). Having lived in several jails from
New York to California, Davis said she began to realize her lack of
attentiveness to issues of gender in her work to free political prisoners.
Many of us, she said of her activist colleagues, began
to think more deeply about prison structures. At the time, said Davis, 200,000 people were in United States jails,
in contrast to todays two million in federal and state prisons
and county jails, not including undocumented people in Immigration and
Naturalization Service detention centers. The fastest growing sector
of the prison population, she noted, are women, of which there are currently
115,000, most of whom are black, Latina, and poor. Davis blamed the de-establishment of the welfare system
for eliminating the pittance that served as an inadequate safety
net for women, in particular. She additionally criticized welfare-to-work
programs, noting that most women participants are barely able to earn
minimum wage. The programs, she said, fail to address the needs of women
with children, or the high costs of rent, and are among the forces
causing the prisons to swell in what has become a vast punishment
industry. Davis pointed out that the punishment extends to denying prisoners
the right to participate in the electoral process and cited an alarming
example from her native state. Alabama denies suffrage to anyone convicted
of a felony, she said, leaving a mere third of the states male
population with the right to vote. The irony, said Davisgiven
Alabamas history as the site of major civil rights battles and
voter registration drivesserves to underscore the current state
of emergency. But democracy, she told the audience, is not primarily about
electoral rights. Established in the eighteenth century, the original
penitentiary system was a place to do penance, she said,
a place of reform to enable the re-made citizen to participate in democracy.
The system failed because its inventors assumed that utter solitude,
solitary confinement, taught people how to live in freedom. After
the Civil War, the convict lease system provided labor for planters
and industrialists, and the prison system became management for a new
labor force. As for convicted women, the prison rehabilitation system, said Davis,
was designed to transform them into good mothers and good wives.
Ironically, todays system works to deny women contact with children
and families. She characterized the United States system as constituting
an assault to women, children, and families, and noted that
other countries are more progressive in this area. Ultimately, said Davis, todays prison industrial complex functions
through the deep involvements of corporations that manage a perpetual
prisoner machine. She cited as an example telephone companies
competing for and profiting from prison contracts. She also noted the
popularity of large correction fairs, and the trend toward
privatization, in which prisons are directly controlled by corporations.
Forty billion dollars, she said, are spent on punishment each year in
the United States.The prison industrial complex is not an aberration,
its a very rational response, linked to conditions we assume are
for the practice of democracy and globalization. It maintains relations
of domination. Davis blames the decline of social and economic systems for the poor
and minorities for feeding the prison system. It has produced an
intersectional quagmire, she explained, where issues of class,
reproductive rights, economic rights, and race are intertwined in a
system of punishment and incarceration. How do we challenge the
ideologies that keep these structures in place? she asked. She
urged the audience to consider our own complicity. We
should have a democracy of health care, housing, jobs, a living wageespecially
for women and working mothers. This would be the new abolitionism,
she said. The hour-plus lecture also touched on media coverage of the current Olympic games and penal history in Australia. Photograph by Nancy Palmieri. |