Front-Page News

Water Everywhere? Sandra L. Postel is a featured author in this year's The Best American Science and Nature Writing (Houghton Mifflin, 2001), which includes a piece by Postel titled "Troubled Waters" that originally ran in the journal The Sciences. She is director of the Global Water Policy Project in Amherst and a visiting senior lecturer in environmental studies at Mount Holyoke. "Troubled Waters" explores the ramifications of mounting water scarcity on agriculture, the environment, and international affairs. International disputes over water are becoming more frequent as populations grow and nations that share major rivers seek to maximize their use of this limited resource. The September/October issue of Foreign Policy features a another water-related piece coauthored by Postel. In "Dehydrating Conflict," Postel and coauthor Aaron T. Wolf survey growing tensions about water usage and propose mechanisms for better international cooperation. An excerpt from the essay appears below.

History supports the hopeful notion that fresh water may foster cooperation more often than conflict in the years ahead. Water sharing has regularly brought even hostile neighboring states together. But the unprecedented degree of current water stress is creating more zero-sum situations in which one party's gain is perceived as another's loss—both within and between countries. The challenge to governments and international bodies is to recognize the new geography and causes of water-related conflict and to embrace three guiding principles as they act to promote water security.
First, efforts to increase the productivity of water use output per unit of water are key to defusing tensions as water stress worsens. Measures such as drip irrigation (a highly efficient technique that delivers water directly to the roots of crops), shifts in cropping patterns, recycling and reusing wastewater, and water-thrifty household appliances enable cities and farming regions to do more with less water. Since agriculture accounts for two-thirds of water use worldwide, and 80 to 90 percent in many developing countries, increasing the productivity of irrigation water is particularly critical. Several water-short urban areas, including greater Los Angeles and Beijing, are investing in conservation improvements on nearby farms in exchange for the water those investments save. The farmers stay in production, the city obtains additional water supplies at a reasonable cost, and cooperation replaces competition. Moreover, where water conservation and productivity improvements eliminate the need for a new dam or river diversion, or allow a big project to be scaled down in size, they also address a major source of tension and conflict. As the costs of desalination decrease, the desalting of contaminated aquifers and of seawater may generate new drinking water supplies and thereby ease tensions in water-scarce regions as well.

Second, stronger policies are needed in most countries to regulate groundwater use, to price irrigation and urban water in ways that encourage thriftiness instead of waste, and to protect rivers and lakes from degradation. Greater assistance to governments from international agencies in carrying out these policy and management reforms could help lessen the likelihood of future water conflicts. Letting globalization loose in the form of poorly regulated privatization of water services or unconstrained private funding of dam construction will likely cause more problems than it solves. In this regard, the 2000 report of the independent World Commission on Dams, which establishes recommendations for more socially responsible planning and assessment of dams, is an important step forward. Among other things, the report calls for an open decision-making process that includes all those affected by a proposed dam; a thorough examination of the full range of alternatives to determine if a dam is really the best choice; negotiations with and adequate compensation for those adversely affected by dam construction; and, where international rivers are concerned, regional cooperation and collaboration. While some governments have publicly endorsed the commission's recommendations, others—India, for instance—have disavowed them.

Third, governments and international organizations must act early and constructively. Some of the most tense water disputes of the twentieth century simmered for decades before the rival parties resolved their differences. After three decades of tension in the Jordan basin, Israel and Jordan included a water-sharing provision in the peace treaty they signed in 1994.

Tensions among the Nile basin countries are finally easing, thanks in part to unofficial dialogues among scientists and technical specialists that have been held since the early 1990s and more recently to a ministerial-level "Nile Basin Initiative" facilitated by the United Nations and the World Bank. India and Bangladesh ended a twenty-year dispute in 1996 with the signing of a treaty that sets out specific terms for sharing the dry-season flow of the Ganges.

The entire article may be read at www.foreignpolicy.com/issue_Sept Oct_2001/postel.html#bio.


[Index]

 

----------------------------------------

Home | MyMHC | Web Email | Directories | SiteMap | Search | Help

Admission | Academics | Campus Life | Athletics
Library & Technology | About the College | Alumnae | News & Events | Offices & Services

Copyright © 2001 Mount Holyoke College. This page created by The Office of Communications and maintained by Jennifer Adams. Last modified on October 19, 2001.