|
Front-Page News
Water Everywhere? Sandra L. Postel is a featured author in this
year's The Best American Science and Nature Writing (Houghton
Mifflin, 2001), which includes a piece by Postel titled "Troubled
Waters" that originally ran in the journal The Sciences. She
is director of the Global Water Policy Project in Amherst and a visiting
senior lecturer in environmental studies at Mount Holyoke. "Troubled
Waters" explores the ramifications of mounting water scarcity
on agriculture, the environment, and international affairs. International
disputes over water are becoming more frequent as populations grow
and nations that share major rivers seek to maximize their use of
this limited resource. The September/October issue of Foreign Policy
features a another water-related piece coauthored by Postel. In "Dehydrating
Conflict," Postel and coauthor Aaron T. Wolf survey growing tensions
about water usage and propose mechanisms for better international
cooperation. An excerpt from the essay appears below.
History supports the hopeful notion that fresh water may foster
cooperation more often than conflict in the years ahead. Water sharing
has regularly brought even hostile neighboring states together.
But the unprecedented degree of current water stress is creating
more zero-sum situations in which one party's gain is perceived
as another's lossboth within and between countries. The
challenge to governments and international bodies is to recognize
the new geography and causes of water-related conflict and to embrace
three guiding principles as they act to promote water security.
First, efforts to increase the productivity of water use output
per unit of water are key to defusing tensions as water stress worsens.
Measures such as drip irrigation (a highly efficient technique that
delivers water directly to the roots of crops), shifts in cropping
patterns, recycling and reusing wastewater, and water-thrifty household
appliances enable cities and farming regions to do more with less
water. Since agriculture accounts for two-thirds of water use worldwide,
and 80 to 90 percent in many developing countries, increasing the
productivity of irrigation water is particularly critical. Several
water-short urban areas, including greater Los Angeles and Beijing,
are investing in conservation improvements on nearby farms in exchange
for the water those investments save. The farmers stay in production,
the city obtains additional water supplies at a reasonable cost,
and cooperation replaces competition. Moreover, where water conservation
and productivity improvements eliminate the need for a new dam or
river diversion, or allow a big project to be scaled down in size,
they also address a major source of tension and conflict. As the
costs of desalination decrease, the desalting of contaminated aquifers
and of seawater may generate new drinking water supplies and thereby
ease tensions in water-scarce regions as well.
Second, stronger policies are needed in most countries to regulate
groundwater use, to price irrigation and urban water in ways that
encourage thriftiness instead of waste, and to protect rivers and
lakes from degradation. Greater assistance to governments from international
agencies in carrying out these policy and management reforms could
help lessen the likelihood of future water conflicts. Letting globalization
loose in the form of poorly regulated privatization of water services
or unconstrained private funding of dam construction will likely
cause more problems than it solves. In this regard, the 2000 report
of the independent World Commission on Dams, which establishes recommendations
for more socially responsible planning and assessment of dams, is
an important step forward. Among other things, the report calls
for an open decision-making process that includes all those affected
by a proposed dam; a thorough examination of the full range of alternatives
to determine if a dam is really the best choice; negotiations with
and adequate compensation for those adversely affected by dam construction;
and, where international rivers are concerned, regional cooperation
and collaboration. While some governments have publicly endorsed
the commission's recommendations, othersIndia, for instancehave
disavowed them.
Third, governments and international organizations must act early
and constructively. Some of the most tense water disputes of the
twentieth century simmered for decades before the rival parties
resolved their differences. After three decades of tension in the
Jordan basin, Israel and Jordan included a water-sharing provision
in the peace treaty they signed in 1994.
Tensions among the Nile basin countries are finally easing, thanks
in part to unofficial dialogues among scientists and technical specialists
that have been held since the early 1990s and more recently to a
ministerial-level "Nile Basin Initiative" facilitated
by the United Nations and the World Bank. India and Bangladesh ended
a twenty-year dispute in 1996 with the signing of a treaty that
sets out specific terms for sharing the dry-season flow of the Ganges.
The entire article may be read at www.foreignpolicy.com/issue_Sept
Oct_2001/postel.html#bio.
|