|
Dean of Faculty Report, February 2006
At every monthly faculty meeting during the school year,
the Dean of Faculty presents brief overviews of recent publications
and other achievements by the Mount Holyoke faculty. Here
are excerpts from the February 2006 report of Donal O'Shea,
Dean of Faculty
BOOKS
(AND FILM)
Associate
professor of art and chair of art and art history Ajay
Sinha’s coedited volume Bollyworld: Popular Indian
Cinema through a Transnational Lens has just appeared with
Sage Press.
The volume originated in a panel that Ajay organized several
years ago in Chicago at a meeting of the Association for
Asian Studies,
but clearly outgrew the panel’s original scope and charge.
Ajay’s introductory essay with coeditor Raminder Kaur of
University of Sussex sketches some of the to-me-revelatory set
of observations and themes that emerge from the essays in the
book. Ajay argues that both Hollywood and Bollywood are not mere
national
artifacts, but can be usefully, and perhaps best, understood
in the context of a globalized world. Moreover, when so viewed,
they
emerge as a sort of obverse of one another. Both provide different,
but coherent, insights into the globalized cultural economy and
participate in the making of such. But they function somewhat
differently: whereas Hollywood homogenizes cultural experience,
Bollywood fragments
it. The book makes an utterly convincing case. As additional
bonuses, the book has some great color photos and the essays
provide an
engrossing introduction to some films that are perhaps well known
to film types, but that I’d never encountered. About halfway
through the book, I joined Netflix.
You
might, at first blush, think that associate professor of classics
and chair of classics and Italian Geoff
Sumi’s book Ceremony and
Power: Performing Politics in Rome between Republic and Empire,
which appeared late last term with the University of Michigan
Press, is a scholarly monograph with necessarily
narrow appeal. The cover
is a sober, solid library green and the acknowledgements
state that the book is a substantially revised
version of Geoff’s
dissertation. But start into it, and first impressions vanish
instantly. You enter the world of the Roman Empire at a crucial
juncture in
its history, the years 44-43 BCE, a time of instability following
the assassination of Julius Caesar. The book examines the
complicated relation between individual power,
familial privilege, and
public support on the one hand, and ceremony, oratory, and
other forms
of performance on the other. Successful performance resulted
in power, and power in turn gave access to performance. Geoff
writes
beautifully and his deep scholarship sits gracefully on the
text; readers are deftly fed the information and background
needed to
easily understand the narrative and the times. But what transcends
its genre and lends the book its fascination is its odd timeliness.
You cannot read this book and not think of Air Force One,
of the royal yacht Britannia, of the Mission Accomplished
poster
on the
USS Abraham Lincoln, and of the public relations
machinery that surrounds almost every public figure today.
The minute
portrayal
and analysis of political power and performance during a
short period of time in a once powerful empire
2,000 years distant
resonates everywhere with our times. Read this book if you
have some spare
moments. Even if you don’t. I will bet that you wind
up recommending it to colleagues, to students, and to friends,
not just because
it is an extraordinarily beautiful example of accessible
and absorbing scholarly writing, but because it is the best
book
imaginable about
the sometimes noxious topics of marketing, public relations,
and power.
French
professor Samba Gadjigo has finished a documentary film
entitled The Making of Moolade, which is terrific. More
on
this next time.
Debbora
Battaglia, professor of anthropology, Lois
Brown, associate
professor of English and director
of the Weissman
Center for
Leadership and the Liberal Arts, Satya Gabriel, associate
professor of economics,
and Stephen Jones, professor of Russian studies and chair
of Russian and Eurasian studies, have just had books
appear. More
later, when
I have a chance to read them. The titles are E.T.
Culture: Anthropology in Outer Spaces (Debbora, Duke University
Press), Encyclopedia
of the Harlem Literary Renaissance (Lois, Facts on File),
Chinese Capitalism and the Modernist Vision (Satya, Routledge),
Socialism
in Georgian Colors: The European Road to Social Democracy,
1883-1917 (Stephen, Harvard University Press).
GRANTS
Associate professor of chemistry and chair of chemistry
Donnie Cotter has received an award of $65,944 from the
National
Science Foundation for his project Project Development
Fellowship for
a Chemist-Historian: Life and Work of Alexander Smith
(1864–1922).
The award will underwrite part of Donnie’s preparation of
a biography of the little-known, but important, Scottish-American
chemist, Alexander Smith, who established some of the more lasting
educational practices in American university (and college) chemistry
departments. Smith played a vital but not fully examined role,
first at the University of Chicago, and later at Columbia, in the
emergence of the chemistry profession and chemistry graduate training
in the United States. Donnie was instrumental in locating a previously
undiscovered archive of Smith’s personal papers. The award
will also allow Donnie to get some of the scholarly training necessary
to move his scholarly specialty from organometallic chemistry to
professional history of science. I believe this is the first award
in the last five years that a faculty member from the College has
received from the NSF’s Social and Economic Sciences
division. It is certainly the first from the History and Philosophy
of Science
Program of that division.
Thinking that the thin envelope that arrived in December
from the Dreyfus Foundation was yet another flyer announcing
a grant
competition,
associate professor of chemistry Darren Hamilton had
it halfway to the circular file when some impulse bade
him
to open it.
He discovered that he had been awarded a prestigious
Henry-Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award for his project Exploring
the Supramolecular
Utility of a Strong Organic Electron Acceptor. The grant
will allow Darren and his students to continue their
work designing
molecules
that have shapes that are knotted and/or linked in the
topological sense. For example, they have produced molecules
composed
of two copies of a molecule, each with a ring structure
(think, for example,
of a benzene ring), but where the rings in each copy
pass through
each other and can’t be pulled apart without breaking
one of the rings. Some of the base molecules with which Darren
and
his group work bind well with DNA molecules, which may lead
to potential useful applications for the construction of molecules
that could carry out certain predetermined tasks.
PAPERS
I’m running out of time, so will return to some of the stuff
below later. There is lots more I did not get to. Carolyn
Collette, Professor of English Language and Literature on the Alumnae Foundation
and chair of medieval studies, has published a paper with Vincent
DiMarco of the University of Massachusetts entitled “The
Canon Yeoman’s Tale” that is a new area for her, and
represents her burgeoning interest in time, measure, and value
in late medieval culture. The paper appears in a collection entitled
Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales. Incidentally, Carolyn’s
scholarship and leadership in her field have been recently acknowledged
by her appointment as a fellow at York’s distinguished
Centre for Medieval Studies.
Philosophical papers are usually too technical for me,
but assistant professor of philosophy James Harold has
just published
two readable,
really neat ones. One, entitled “Infected by Evil” in
Philosophical Explorations, discusses the possibility, raised by
Plato, that evil behavior in fiction can be infectious and can
actually harm those who consume it. Plato argues that sympathy
with a morally compromised fictional character can inadvertently
undermine one’s own moral beliefs. James discusses recent
scholarship and has great examples (The Godfather,
Reservoir Dogs, and Deep Throat all make a cameo appearance). Another, “Narrative
Engagement with Atonement and The Blind
Assassin” in
Philosophy and Literature, enlarges on the theme of how the
reader identifies
with characters in narrative fiction. Here, again, the examples
are terrific.
Assistant professor of English Amy Martin has a bunch
of new papers that have just appeared and that are utterly
fascinating. The paper “Becoming
a Race Apart: Representing Irish Racial Difference and the British
Working Class in Victorian Critiques of Capitalism” in the
collection Was Ireland a Colony? echoes and contextualizes campus
and national discussions on class and gender. The paper “Nationalism
as Blasphemy: Negotiating Belief and Institutionality in the Genre
of Fenian Recollections” in the collection Evangelicals
and Catholics in Nineteenth-Century Ireland does the same for power
and organized religion. Amy’s paper with her colleague Brendán
Mac Suibhne entitled “Fenians in the Frame: Photographing
Irish Political Prisoners, 1865–68” in the annual Field
Day Review 2005 is a visually stunning interdisciplinary treat
that merges photography and social analysis and that ends by alluding
to parallels between the British treatment of Fenian insurgents
140 years ago and our own government’s response to suspected
domestic terrorists. The use of modern technologies in unusual
circumstances to curtail domestic freedoms and the interaction
between photography and wars on terrorism link the prisoners in
Dublin’s Mountjoy Prison and Iraq’s Abu Ghraib.
Assistant professor of English Nigel Alderman and Scott
Brown, director of the Career Development Center, have
new papers
out. (Nigel’s has diagrams with axes – highly unusual
in a paper on Wordsworth, I would think.) Next time.
Submitted
by Don O’Shea
February 1, 2006
Dean
of Faculty's Reports Index
|