Since the Internet became widely used
in the early and mid-1990s, much has been prophesied about its impact
on higher education, but the public debate has often been shrill
and polarized, obscuring the true potential of new technologies.
Typically, what we hear are arguments between those rushing to embrace
the Internet as an alternative to, and even a substitute for, "traditional"
means of education and those who fear that technology threatens
the face-to-face interaction that makes college and university campuses
vital, transforming places.
On one side are Internet entrepreneurs, venture capitalists,
and some academicians who argue that "distance learning" will
permanently alter the landscape of higher education, potentially
rendering the campus-based university obsolete. As one member
of this camp, Columbia University Teacher's College President
Arthur Levine, warned in a much discussed and much critiqued
essay in the New York Times, "colleges and universities are
not in the campus business, but the education business."
On the other side are faculty, administrators, and interest
groups, who argue that "distance learning" has the potential to
undermine the learning process a process they believe must be
entirely face-to-face campus-based. Some of these critics see
no educational value or potential whatsoever in new technologies
and resist any move away from age-old, low-tech pedagogical approaches.
Even those in higher education who do embrace technology seem
frequently to be motivated by a desire for quick cash (both access
to investor capital and imagined future profits) or fear, rather
than educational vision. These motivations have sometimes been
evident in the rush by colleges and universities to spin-off for-profit
companies to protect their programs in the fast-growing adult-education
market, or to expand into new markets such as corporate training,
or to do both.
What is less common, or perhaps simply receives less attention,
is when an institution makes a careful, reasoned decision to embrace
so-called "distance learning" technologies not just as an addition
to its campus offerings, but as a way to strengthen the campus
experience and better serve existing student populations. This
linkage of Internet-based education with campus-based learning
is where the great untapped educational potential of the Internet
lies for colleges and universities.
At an overwhelming number of these institutions, the most profound
educational moments will continue to occur in the classroom, in
face-to-face interactions between students and faculty, and in
what happens on residential campuses in the evening and on weekends.
Yet the Internet can be a powerful force in strengthening these
educational and social experiences. Students, who have increasingly
grown up buying clothes, reading the news, chatting with friends,
doing research, and applying to college on-line, will come to
expect as much.
Just as they maintain their relationships both face-to-face
and online, and just as they shop both at bricks and mortar stores
and online commerce sites, college students will expect to experience
their education both in person and online. And just as there is
a time when emailing a friend makes sense and a time when seeing
the friend in person makes sense, so too are there times when
online education works and times when face-to-face interaction
is superior. The competitive advantage of traditional campuses,
the "old-school" schools, is that they can offer both.
Many faculty, given support and resources, come up with ingenious
uses of the web that compliment the classroom experience. At Mount
Holyoke, a biology professor and her students are using video
microscopy (making time lapse movies with a video camera attached
to a microscope) and posting their "movies" on the campus network.
In addition to helping students gain an understanding of such
cellular processes as division and locomotion, the videos have
encouraged them to share their findings. Says one student: "When
we work in the lab, we typically only get the chance to see our
own work. Now I can hop on the Internet and take a look at my
classmates' videos." And, she adds, she can "chat" online about
lab experiences.
There are many possibilities for exploiting the power of technology
and the Internet in combination with classroom-based education.
Necessary lectures on basic, foundational concepts may be conveyed
through streaming video over an intranet system so that students
can easily repeat difficult or complex portions of the lecture
(and go back to it at their convenience) and come to class prepared
with questions and observations. The result? Time in class is
more effectively utilized because of increased time spent in meaningful
discussion.
Similarly, guest lecturers can be videotaped and simulcast on
the Internet, drawing alumni, prospective students, and students
studying abroad into campus life. Even years after the lecture,
faculty may put the downloadable lecture on the campus intranet,
along with the reading assignment for that day, for students to
click on and watch.
In these ways, the campus-based classroom experience is strengthened,
not threatened, by the integration of distance learning technologies.
The challenge for those in leadership positions in academia is
to go beyond the "Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom" model characterized
by individual faculty initiative and create a sustained, strategic
push toward an "e-campus" a campus that harnesses the best attributes
of a physical campus and the strengths of technology.
Creating an "e-campus" is more than just wiring dormitories
for high-speed Internet access, equipping classrooms with the
latest technology, or having pretty web pages aimed at external
audiences. An "e-campus" uses technology to strengthen the residential,
interactive nature of the entire college experience. Every activity
from course registration to financial aid processing to the
taking of final exam is critically evaluated and the question
asked: Do technologies allow us to enhance the way we deliver
this service or provide this academic experience to students?
This examination will force colleges to new levels of creativity
and entrepreneurship. Many colleges do not currently have the
expertise or resources to create an "e-campus." Consortial relationships,
outsourcing, partnerships with for-profit providers, and well-conceived
spin-outs of particular activities will all be increasingly common
as institutions seek to leverage resources to maximum effect.
Colleges will have to push against existing boundaries and look
outside their walls for ideas and inspiration. There are many
lessons to be learned from the business world, where companies
are finally beginning to recognize the competitive advantage of
leveraging their physical locations through their online initiatives
(so-called "clicks and mortar" or "clicks and bricks"). Many,
such as Barnes & Noble, have learned the hard way that spinning
off a new venture that simply copies a new entrant rather than
exploiting unique advantages derived from a combination of a physical
and online presence is not a winning strategy.
The self-examination that colleges and universities must undertake
will not be easy, but the payoff is well worth it. The marriage
of technology with traditional modes of learning will leave us
with institutions that are more intimate, more residential, and
more personal. Rather than making residential colleges obsolete,
technology, and all that it enables, can help to further distinguish
these institutions and make the American system of higher education,
already the envy of the world, stronger than ever before.
Joanne V. Creighton is the president
of Mount Holyoke College in South Hadley, Massachusetts. Phil
Buchanan is a principal at the Parthenon Group, a strategic advising
and principal investing firm based in Boston.