Albert's Impossible Toothache

by Barbara Williams


Guidelines for Philosophical Discussion
by Gareth B. Matthews


This story raises the question of whether or not a person can point to something that does not exist and if pointing is the same as saying what you want. There are times when others do not understand if you only point, because sometimes, especially if there is a clutter of objects, what object you are pointing to is ambiguous.

Albert's father believes that because no one in the family has ever had a toothache before, it is impossible that Albert should have one. However, there have been events in history and in our lives when we've experienced new things. It makes you wonder what events are considered impossible and why they are.

Imagination can cause us to believe certain things. Albert is a turtle who believes he has a toothache, but the fact is, turtles do not have teeth. There is a possibility that people can create imaginations so realistic to themselves that their creations can become realities. Also, it brings up the possibility that Albert has forgotten what he is and that he really does not have any teeth. At one point in the story, Albert says that a gopher bit him. It makes you wonder if he means the pain in the gopher's teeth has transferred into his mouth.

Knowledge and belief are sometimes thought to be the same thing and others think they are two different things. If you were sure something was true, is that like believing it? When someone holds a certain belief, it can be changed and what they had known to be true can also change in correlation.

When it comes to lies, there are different types and shades of grey. For example, someone can tell her friend that it is Wednesday without realizing it is really Thursday. The statement she has said is not true, but it is not a lie either.

Continue to question set for this story