Religious Views on Abortion
The Baha'i View: Baha’is
believe the soul is part of the body at conception and that therefore life
begins at conception. Since, the taking of life is prohibited, abortion for
the simple reason of preventing an unwanted pregnancy is forbidden. However,
other abortions, such as abortions to save the life of the mother, is left
to the individuals to decide.
The
Buddhist View:A Buddhist believes that life begins when
consciousness begins. A fetus is said to have consciousness and is therefore
alive. So unnecessary
abortions are prohibited. However, there is debate as to whether it is justifiable
in certain circumstances. Buddhism is against the taking of life. But, there
are different levels of life and not all life is equal. So, for instance,
abortion to save the life of the mother is permissible. Buddhism teaches
that to kill a cow is wrong because cows are living beings also. However,
it is sometimes regrettable, but necessary to kill a cow. Likewise, it is
sometimes regretettable but necessary to kill a fetus. Also, there is no
clear opinion as to whether abortion should be made illegal by law or left
to the mother. Buddhists believe that in a perfect world, no abortions would
be necessary, however they accept that the world is not perfect.
The Catholic
View: Recently the Vatican has stated that a fetus has a right to
life from the moment of conception and that therefore, abortion is a moral
evil. However, Historically Catholic teaching on abortion has been marked
by a variety of ideas, pro-choice ideas included. In fact, Catholic countries
such as France and Belgium have some of the world’s most liberal abortion
laws. The current Catholic approach therefore seems to contradict earlier
teachings. For most of it’s history, the Catholic Church did not consider
abortion at early stages to be killing a human being. Instead, Catholic teaching
has taught that a fetus is not human until it has taken fully human form.
So, the opinion expressed by the Vatican is one of many
Catholic opinions.
The Hinduist
View:There is no dominant position on abortion in the Hindu tradition.
According to Vasu Murti and Mary Krane Derr, Hinduism teaches that abortion
is the taking of a life and should only be done to save the life of the mother.
Most Hindu texts that mention abortion condemn it and view it as a heinous
crime. However, there is also evidence that abortion was widely practiced
for centuries. Also, the moral teachings of Hinduism emphasize the need to
act “for the sake of the good of the world.” But, producing more
children than you or the environment can support in not good for the world.
So, we see here yet another case of conflicting viewpoints
within the religion.
The Jainist
View: Jainism is based on principle AHIMSA, or do no harm. So, some
Jainists are opposed to abortion, however some realize that in certain cases,
it is the least harmful option and should therefore be permitted.
The Jewish View:According
to Rabbi Raymond A. Zwerin and Rabbi Richard J. Shapiro, Jewish law teaches
that the fetus is not considered a full human and therefore has no rights.
It is however considered a part of the woman’s body. Woman are not allowed
to harm themselves and therefore cannot harm the fetus. However, a woman can
sacrifice a part of her body to save her life. Therefore, a woman can abort
a fetus to save her life. And in fact, it is her duty to do so. This is an
interesting twist on the abortion debate. Jews are also against abortion unless
it is necessary, but in this case it is not because of the rights of the fetus,
but the fact that the woman is harming herself. There is also controversy as
to what other reasons justify an abortion.
The Muslim
View: The Islamic opinion on abortion is fairly complex. All Islamic
scholars agree that once the fetus has a soul, it is a living being. In the
case that the fetus does have a soul, not only is abortion a crime except
to save the life of the mother, but the fetus is subject to the laws of inheritance.
In other words, if the mother is sentenced to death by capital punishment,
her life should be preserved to protect the fetus. However, there is much
debate as to when exactly the fetus gets a soul. Several schools within the
Muslim tradition have been created. Among Sunni Muslims, followers of Mohammed,
the main schools are Hanafi, Shaf’I, Maliki, and Hanbali. Among Shi’ite
Muslims, followers of Ali, the main schools are Zavdi, Imami, and Isma’ili.
The majority of Muslims from the Hanafi and Zavdi schools believe ensoulment
doesn’t occur until 120 days after fertilization. Hanbali scholors
believe ensoulment occurs after only 40 days. Some Shafi’I scholars
believe ensoulment occurs after 80 days, while other believe it occurs after
120 days. So once again, there is much disagreement
over the issue of abortion.
The
Native American View: Most Native Americans discourage overpopulation
and believe it is a disgrace to have too many children. They also believe
in the right of the woman to choose what she does to her own body, this implies
that they do not believe life starts at conception.
The Pagan
View: Most pagans look a lot at the Greek gods such as Artemis or
Diana, the Huntress. Her myth also contains similar contradictions to the
contractions of the abortion issue. For instance, she is both the protecter
and killer of animals. Why? Pagans believe she can’t fully protect
life without having power over death, which she does not. Abortion is about
love life and death. From a pagan point of view, it is absurd to sacrifice
a mother for the sake of an unborn child, because the child obviously needs
her. In most Goddess religions, it is morally acceptable that a woman who
gives life may also destroy life under certain circumstances. Just as Artemis
might kill a wounded animal rather than allow it to suffer, A mother may
spare the child a painful destiny by aborting it. The woman doesn’t
dislike the fetus, she has to make a sacrifice for something more important.
Also, Paganism denies a true God and therefore denies that we are His greatest
gift. This means that a sacrifice can be made. But, some pagans also say
that if the woman had more support, she wouldn’t need to abort. They
argue that the child is often aborted out of convenience, and that the mother
does not have that right. They argue that the unborn child is important and
should have someone to stick up for it. So, like most religions there are
different and conflicting viewpoints within the religion.
The Protestant
View:Contrary to popular belief, there is no one Protestant position
on abortion. Protestants who oppose abortion often portray themselves as
the only real Christians and are very vocal in their opinion. However, pro-choice
Protestants are also common, although not as vocal. In fact, some say pro-choice
Protestants
are even the majority.
The
Taoist/Confusionist View: There is nothing in Taoism or Confucianism
that explicity forbids abortion and there is evidence that it was practiced
in ancient Chinese culture. With an emphasis on compassion and harmony, the
Chinese did see it as justifiable under certain circumstances. However, it
has always been used as a last resort and was seen as wrong if it was unnecessary.
The decision of whether it is necessary is left entirely up to the parents.
The
Unitarian Universalist View: The Unitarian Univeralist Association’s
official position paper states that a woman is entitled to safe and affordable
abortion services including government funded counceling. Unitarian Universalists
believe in the worth and dignity of every person and their individual decisions.
They believe people have the ability to determine for themselves what is
moral. They therefore believe in the woman’s right to terminate an
unwanted pregnancy.
So, for most of the worlds religions, there is a lot of controversy and dispute surrounding abortion. That is not even people of the same religion hold any one opinion.
Designed by Margo Anderson on 5/12/06 through Mount Holyoke College.
Contact Info: msanders@mtholyoke.edu