|

USA
USA's Position in April 1994
The
USA was not concerned over the situation in Rwanda.
"...
I mention it only because there are a sizable number of Americans
there and it is a very tense situation. And I just want to assure
the families of those who are there that we are doing everything we
possible can to be on top of the situation to take all the appropriate
steps to try to assure the safety of our citizens there." (president
Bill Clinton's statement to the press on April 8, 1994)
The
USA did not publicly declare the Rwandan crisis to be a genocide.
"...the
use of the term 'genocide' has a very precise legal meaning, although
it's not strictly a legal determination. There are other factors in
there as well." (State Department spokeswoman Christine Shelley,
April 28, 1994)
USA's Position in May 1994
The
USA decided to limit its involvement in international peacekeeping operations
in Rwanda.
"When
I wake up every morning and look at the headlines and the stories
and the images on television of these conflicts, I want to work to
end every conflict. I want to work to save every child out there.
And I know the president does, and I know the American people do.
But neither we nor the international community have the resources
nor the mandate to do so. So we have to make distinctions. We have
to ask the hard questions about where and when we can intervene. And
the reality is that we cannot often solve other people's problems;
we can never build their nations for them ..." (press briefing
given by Anthony Lake, National Security Advisor, May 5, 1994)
"...
The United States has been a driving force in the provision of humanitarian
assistance, in condemning the violence and in trying to organize a
U.N. mission designed not simply to promise, but to deliver what it
promises. Sending a U.N. force into the maelstrom in Rwanda without
a sound plan of operations would be folly ... The resolution adopted
last night requires the Secretary-General to report back before the
next phase of deployment begins ... these choices are not easy ones.
Emotions can produce wonderful speeches and stirring op-ed pieces.
But emotions alone cannot produce policies that will achieve what
they promise. If we do not keep commitments in line with capabilities,
we will only further undermine U.N. credibility and support. The actions
authorized last night will help. They may save lives. But ultimately,
the future of Rwanda is in Rwandan hands." (statement of Madeleine
Albright at Capitol Hill on Security Council resolution and the position
of the USA, MAy 17, 1994)
Statements and Interviews
-
-
Gloriosa
Uwimpuhwe (genocide survivor that talked to President Clinton
on his trip to Africa)
-
James
Woods (Deputy Assistant Secretary for African Affairs at the Department
of Defense from 1986-1994)
-
Tony
Marley (Political Military Advisor for the U.S. State Department
from 1992-95)
Home
| UN's role | France's role
| ICRC's role
|
"So
we have to make distinctions. We have to ask the hard questions
about where and when we can intervene. And the reality is that
we cannot often solve other people's problems; we can never build
their nations for them ..."
Anthony
Lake, National Security Advisor
May
5, 1994
|
|
©
White House
President
Clinton's trip to Africa in 1995
|
|