Slavery in Sudan

 

 

Home

The Economist

Conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

::Recommendation ::

By conclusion, we have proposed different possible causes of the continuing problem of slavery in Sudan that include political instability, the civil war, culture and religion issues, economic and political interest and the accountability of international actors. It is important to examine the cause of the problem to find the way to approach it effectively. The problem is caused by both internal and external factors. Since slavery is deeply rooted in the Sudanese history, the possible way is to deal with the way the history shapes it. What do we mean by this argument?

Colonization deprived liberty from the southern people on the purpose of economic exploitation. The continuing civil war is a battle that demands for rights, liberty and freedom. Religion has imposed the political regime that limits rights of certain groups. At the same time, the current event is repeating the history of colonial exploitation. Many western foreign businesses are penetrating into the country. The whole problem occurs because of an absence of power of the local people. Their rights, liberty and security have been withdrawn for a long time. This action has been practiced until it becomes part of its culture. The denial of the government responsibility shows its attempt to make it become a culture that is finally unable to eliminate.

The second breaking civil war after it had ended in 1960's was caused by a dishonouring agreement of the government. It broke a promise that would hand over power to the southern people. These people showed their strong determination in protecting their people long time ago, but achieved nothing. Over millions of deaths and casualties become the cost they have to pay for their liberty. We think that an autonomy of the southern people should be granted because a self-determination is the best guarantee against future betrayals. When the government fails to protect its people, they should hand over its power back to the people. We think that this reconciliation is less threatening to the national stability than prolonging war. In fact, giving up part of its national sovereignty to the local level for the purpose of natonal security does make sense. At the same time, the international actors should take certain level of responsibility. Especially, foreign investors who obsessively concerns about their economic interest. This is an obstacle to impose economic sanction to the Sudanese government. Therefore, the recommendation requires both local and international cooperation to achieve the goal.

 

 

 

 

news.htm actor.htm economic.htm religion.htm civilwar.htm history.htm environment.htm