THE WHITE HOUSE

                     Office of the Press Secretary
________________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release                                   November 17, 1998



PRESS BRIEFING BY DEPUTY NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR JIM STEINBERG, NATIONAL ECONOMIC ADVISOR GENE SPERLING, DEPUTY TREASURY SECRETARY LARRY SUMMERS, 17 November 1998


                            The Briefing Room


11:05 A.M. EST


MR. LOCKHART:  Good morning, everybody.  Joining us this morning to
give you a sense of the President's trip to Japan, Korea, South Korea
and Guam are the Deputy National Security Advisor, Jim Steinberg; Larry
Summers, the Deputy Treasury Secretary; and Gene Sperling, who is
Director of the President's National Economic Council.

Let me just, as promised this morning, give you a readout.  The
President, at about 10:30 a.m. this morning, spoke with the Vice
President from Malaysia.  The Vice President briefed the President on
the days he's there and the meetings he's had, the progress we've made
at the APEC meeting.  And the President thanked the Vice President for
going over there on short notice and participating on his behalf.

Q Will the Vice President come back here before the President leaves?

MR. LOCKHART:  I think he won't be back here as to the -- I was asked
yesterday something about whether they would both would be out of the
country.  I think the way the schedule looks now, if we leave on time --
which, as you all know, is a highly questionable proposition -- there
may be a few minutes where the President leaves our air space, the Vice
President has yet to arrive.  But it's a matter of minutes, and --

Q Did they talk about the controversial speech?
 
MR. LOCKHART:  Let me finish this.  But either way, as you all know,
the President remains the President no matter where he is and we have
excellent communications.

Q Did the President Clinton tell Vice President Gore that he supports
everything that Gore said at APEC?

MR. LOCKHART:  Absolutely.  The Vice President briefed the President on
the speech he gave.  The President said that he believed the Vice
President did an excellent job and commended him for the speech and for
his overall effort during the two days over there.

Q Was it the same speech that President Clinton was scheduled to
address?
     
      MR. LOCKHART:  It certainly was the same speech that the President
was planning to use, and it certainly reflects U.S. policy.
     
      Q So the wording he used is what President Clinton would have
used, had he been --
     
      MR. LOCKHART:  It was certainly the speech that we were planning
to give, and it reflects U.S. policy.
     
      Q Joe, you indicated earlier you might have something to say on
the cross-examination?
     
      MR. LOCKHART:  These guys have a much tighter schedule than me.
Let's do this.
     
      Q   Are you going to brief afterwards?
     
      MR. LOCKHART:  I'll come back after.
     
      So, Jim.
     
      MR. STEINBERG:  Good morning.
     
      Q   How did you feel about the bombing of Iraq?
     
      MR. STEINBERG:  Let's talk about the trip.
     
      Q   Are you going on the trip?
     
      MR. STEINBERG:  Let me give you a brief overview of the schedule
and just briefly on the security part.  You've all already heard from
Ken Lieberthal earlier, so I won't spend a lot of time on the specifics.
     
      I think the President feels it's very important that he is going
to have an opportunity to take this part of the trip.  It really
reflects the very strong commitment that he has to U.S. engagement in
Asia, and particularly the importance of these two allies of ours.  The
cornerstone of our engagement in Asia is built around our engagement
with our treaty allies, and none are more important than Japan and
Korea.
     
      The President will arrive in Japan.  He'll begin with a private
visit with the Emperor and the Empress.  This is actually a genuinely
private visit -- they're going to go to the private residence, which is
a very rare honor that they've offered to the President.  It very rarely
happened in the past.
     
      The President will then tape, for later broadcast that evening, a
town hall conversation with the Japanese people.  There will be a group
of sort of young-ish Japanese, 20 to 40 year olds, in the audience.  It
will give him a chance to talk directly to the people of Japan about
their issues and concerns and to give him a chance to talk about the
United States and our perspective on many issues in security and
economics that engage us both.
     
      The next day, he'll give a talk to the American Chamber of
Commerce, followed by a bilateral meeting with the Japanese Prime
Minister.  He'll go on that evening to Korea.  The events on the first
day in Korea will be bilateral meetings with President Kim Dae-jung,
followed by a press conference; and following that, a round table on
democracy, civil society with a group of Koreans to talk about democracy
building in Korea, the impact of the changes and reform on day to day
life and on the aspirations of the Korean people.
     
      On Sunday he'll probably attend church and then he'll go to the
Korea Training Center where he'll have a chance to talk to both U.S.
and Korean troops, share a meal with them and then on to Osan Air Force
Base to give a talk to U.S. forces there.  And then the following day
he'll go to Guam.
     
      Just briefly on political and security agenda -- as I said, this
will be an opportunity for him to reaffirm the centrality of the
alliances that we have with these two countries.  I think very prominent
on the agenda will be discussions about the situation in North Korea and
the variety of our concerns about the North Korean nuclear program and
their missile program.  And very importantly, a chance to talk in both
countries to the people directly about our stakes and our commitment to
being involved in Asia and our relationships with them -- with a
particular emphasis on the efforts to sustain economic growth and
democracy during these challenging times.
     
      Q   You won't go to the DMZ?
     
      MR. STEINBERG: He's not going to the DMZ, but he has two separate
events on security at the Korea Training Center and Osan.  So he's got
really one whole day focused on our security engagement with Korea.
     
      Q   Will he reinforce --
     
      MR. STEINBERG:  Why don't we let Gene go ahead?
     
      MR. SPERLING:  The President has clearly made clear on many
occasions over the last year how critical the resurgence of growth in
Japan is to the economic revitalization of the region, and he will
continue to stress those points, the very important need for demand-led
growth and for positive growth in Japan, the need for prompt, corrective
action in the banking reform and the importance of further market
opening and deregulation -- altogether the three being essential
components to resurgence of growth that has never been more important to
world growth than it is right now with Japan supplying 70 percent of the
economic power of the region.
     
      The President will go on to Korea, certainly South Korea.   Kim
Dae-jung has made significant economic reforms and has much to be
complimented on.  There is obviously further work to do in ensuring that
everyone, including the large conglomerates -- are doing their part.
     
      I will let -- Deputy Secretary Summers will go into more detail on
these financial areas.  Let me say something in the trade area.
Charlene Barshefsky, our USTR, is in Malaysia as we speak.
     
      But on this third component, this certainly is a critical time in
the world economy for market opening, it is critical to the growth in
the region.  While U.S. imports from Southeast Asia have been up $5
billion, they've been down $15 billion in Japan.  And so the combination
of market opening and demand-led growth is an integral part to helping
the region.
     
      It's also critical for us to show that even in these difficult
times there's a commitment to further market opening.  And we count on
Japan joining us in a leadership role in further tariff reductions in
the WTO, in the nine sectors discussed in APEC, in which 16 countries
did make commitments in the hope of leveraging those for an
international agreement in the same way that the information technology
agreement started at APEC and then went to the World Trade Organization.
     
      The President will also stress the importance of making progress
on the agreements that we already have in areas from insurance to flat
glass, where there's not been satisfactory progress.  One of the
positive efforts that we've been able to make over the last few years
has been in the deregulation initiative, where at Birmingham we had
concrete steps that were announced in housing, pharmaceuticals,
telecommunications and financial services, we hope to be able to work on
something that could be announced next time the two leaders met on those
areas in energy as well, making further progress.
     
      And, finally, the President will stress the importance at this
time of ensuring that we are operating under a rule based trading
system.  There certainly is concern at the surge in steel, the increase
by over 500 percent of hot rolled steel imported into the United States
from Japan.  And the President will stress the importance of each
country at this time ensuring that they are operating by a rule based
trading measures to help further the confidence in our rule based open
market trading system that has served the global economy so well over
the last couple of decades.
     
      With that, let me turn to Deputy Secretary Summers and then we
will be available for questions.
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  The President goes to Japan to continue
our financial and economic dialogue with Japan at a significant moment.
Following the G-7's recognition that the balance of risks have changes,
U.S. passage of the IMF legislation, Japanese passage of banking
legislation, agreements to cooperate on the development of the future
international financial architecture -- there has been some improvement
in the behavior of markets and some signs of a return of confidence in
recent weeks.
     
      At the same time, large problems remain.  After a period of
prolonged recession Japan is not expecting, quoting from many
forecasters, on the basis of all the actions that have been taken to
date, to enjoy meaningful growth next year with most forecasts negative.
Deflationary risk factors in Japan have been sufficiently large that
negative interest rates have been observed in recent weeks.
     
      At a time when continued demand is crucial to the global economy
-- and in particular to the Asian economy -- Japan's current account
surplus has substantially increased and is expected to exceed three
percent of GDP in 1998 and 1999.  Japanese imports from eight major
Asian economies have actually fallen in the past year by more than 13
percent, while U.S. imports from these countries have risen.
     
      So economic policy in Japan and what the United States and Japan
can do together for the Asian economies and the global economy will be
very much on the agenda when President Clinton meets with Prime Minister
Obuchi.
     
      The initiative announced in Kuala Lumpur to cooperate for Asian
growth and recovery through the provision of finance for trade and for
private sector restructuring will, I'm sure, be a subject of discussion.
And crucial economic policy priorities in Japan, making sure that fiscal
stimulus is well and vigorously applied -- and we have seen some signs
after lagging implementation with evidence of public construction
increasing by 30 percent in September.  That will be very much a subject
on the agenda.
     
      And so, too, will be banking policy which, since the time that
President Clinton and Prime Minister Obuchi last met, the Diet has
passed substantial legislation making substantial funds available for
the Japanese banking system.  But if that legislation is to have the
desired effects it is crucial that transparency be increased, that funds
be used as bad assets are disposed of and liquidated into the market, as
was done with the RTC here; and it is crucial, also, that the
orientation of the financial system be tilted towards lending to
productive uses and away from continued lending for unproductive low
return projects.
     
      So with the situation in Japan, there will be a great deal to talk
about regarding the Japanese situation and also the situation in Asia
more generally.
     
      In Korea, where interest rates have come down to single digits,
where exchange rate stability has been observed for some time, and where
the sense of rapid decline in output has abated, an important priority
will be private sector financial restructuring.  And there the actions
that the United States is going to take in the trade finance area, and
that working with the Japanese and the multilateral banks we intend to
take to support bank recapitalization and private sector restructuring,
will be important areas for discussion.
     
      Q Gene, you talk about areas of economic concern and lack of
progress in Japan.  How far off the tracks is this relationship?  How
critical is the United States?  Can you just give us a summary?  What
will the President say about the state of the U.S.-Japanese economic
relationship?
     
      MR. SPERLING:  I think, first of all, the obvious answer -- and
I'll let the President speak for himself there -- but I think that the
President and I think our policy has been to speak frankly about what
was positive and what we see lacking.  There certainly was a positive
cooperation on the corporate debt restructuring initiative that was
announced yesterday, that was announced simultaneously in statements by
Prime Minister Obuchi and President Clinton.  That was, I think, a very
clear example of how our two governments work together cooperatively.
     
      In the banking reform area, I think that the President, Secretary
Rubin, Deputy Secretary Summers have been positive in praising the sums
of resources that have been put forward to deal with this, but have also
been, as Secretary Summers was, candid in acknowledging that the
implementation of that, whether it is done in a decisive and prompt way,
will be critical to the success.
     
      Clearly, there is no question that we were hoping for more
cooperation in the early -- the EVSL, or the trade agreement, trade
effort in APEC.  And our USTR, Charlene Barshefsky, did a terrific job
of moving that forward, that process forward and getting an agreement
that that be worked on in the World Trade Organization.  But, again,
there's no secret that we were disappointed by their lack of willingness
to take some tough steps there.
     
      But, again, to the extent that we now have an agreement to work
together to try to get those tariff reductions as part of the WTO,
that's a positive step we can focus on.  So I think that this is
unquestionably a positive and warm relationship between the two top
economic powers and two of the top democracies in the world.  But there
has unquestionably been some very real differences of opinion on areas
that we think are critical to regaining economic strength in the region
and we'll speak candidly and frankly to those individual matters as we
have for some time.
     
      Q To follow up, what kind of overall grade would you give them?
     
      MR. SPERLING:  Professor Summers?  I haven't really graded since
Wharton.
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  The course isn't over for any of us,
and so we're in no position to give grades.
     
      I think what's important to stress is that this is a positive sum
agenda.  The United States and Japan have a common objective.  Japan is
not satisfied with negative growth in Japan.  Japan has the same stake
we do in the resumption of growth and confidence in Asia.  So we will
acknowledge together that there are real problems remaining, but very
much it is a cooperative agenda of working together to solve those
problems.  And I know that the President enjoys a strong relationship
with Prime Minister Obuchi and certainly Secretary Rubin very much
values his relationship with Prime Minister Miyazawa and that goes right
down the line across our governments.
     
      Q What's your thinking on the latest stimulus package?   They keep
adding more money, but it never seems to be enough.
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  We'll have to evaluate it fully and
evaluate which part -- which components of it are incremental; and
obviously what will be crucial will be the speed of implementation.  I
think it is desirable that they are recognizing the importance of
domestic demand and they are taking further steps to spur it.  But we
continue to be concerned that with forecasts of growth for 1999 that are
negative and that have deteriorated in recent months despite all that
has been done, that it will be important for Japan to focus going
forward on doing enough to create momentum, to get their economy going
after what has been the longest recession that they have experienced in
the post-war period.
     
      Q Two hundred billion dollars in stimulus package doesn't get that
done, Larry?
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  Let me take this and then this.
     
      Q Do you see anything different in this stimulus package that
would lead you to believe that it will make a difference as compared to
the numerous stimulus packages that have contained apparently similar
types of things before?
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  I'm glad you asked that question, which
I think is related to the question that Scott was asking.
     
      I think it is very important that in looking at Japanese fiscal
policy, we focus not on particular spending that is identified as a
stimulus package, but instead focus on what the overall budget posture
was; because often, the stimulus package comes on top of a baseline
which is very contractionary.  For example, the level of fiscal stimulus
in 1998 is still, according to IMF figures, significantly below that
that was in place two years ago in 1996.  And it is important to
recognize that the year of most rapid growth, 1996, corresponded to the
year when fiscal stimulus was most vigorously applied in Japan.
     
      So our reading of the evidence is that on those occasions when
fiscal stimulus has been vigorously applied according to the
internationally accepted measures, when you take the overall budget put
together that, in fact, it has resulted in significant growth -- and
that on some occasions, the stimulus packages have not been large
enough, even though they've been called stimulus packages, to offset
what otherwise would have been a contractionary baseline.
     
      So what will be crucial going forward will be that the overall
posture of fiscal policy going into 1999 be expansionary, and in that
case, we believe that fiscal policy certainly can make a difference in
an economy like Japan's where there is substantial unused capacity, as
represented by significant unemployment and very low interest rates, and
so the crowding out concerns that arise in other contexts are not likely
to be large.
     
      Q If you're looking at contraction into 1999, what is the effect
of that alone on the American economy?
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  Clearly, we have an important stake in
growth in Japan, both because of its impact on export demand for U.S.
products and because our capital markets are very tightly linked.  But I
believe that if the Japanese situation and the global situation more
generally remains contained, that the basic momentum of expansion in the
United States should continue.
     
      We have a very healthy expansion because it is based, unlike our
previous long expansions, not on consumption and government spending,
but instead on investment and on exports.  That gives a basis for it to
continue as a healthy expansion.
     
      MR. SPERLING:  Just one fact, though, directly is that our exports
to Japan are down 12 percent this year, so in its most direct effect,
the lack of satisfactory market opening and demand certainly does have
effect on our exports to the degree that it's critical to the economic
health of the region.  In that impact, it is a broader impact.  That
does not mean we're not positive about the projection for sustained
growth in the future, but just to say that from the start we have always
has this need to be monitored because in this situation, everything --
no country is completely immune, including the United States.
     
      QQ My sense from Larry, though, Gene, is that it's a minor drag on
the economy.
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  Clearly the global situation has
important sectoral impacts and, depending on how it plays out, could
pose real risks.  There are risks that no one should want to run and
there are sectoral dislocations that are quite important.  So it is very
much in the economic interests of the United States -- I don't want to
minimize that in any way -- it is very much in the economic interest of
the United States that the Japanese economy get back on track as rapidly
as possible.
     
      But at the same time, I think the basic momentum of expansion
should continue.
     
      MR. SPERLING:  I just think it's important to understand there's
the direct impact in terms of our trade exports and then there is the
indirect impact to the degree that Japan's resurgence is critical to
resurgence of growth in the region and how that affects the global
economy.
     
      So our concerns throughout have always been not on just the
impacts of a particular country, but of the health of the global economy
and giving stability there; because if that were to become unmanageable,
that would start to have more of a significant impact on the U.S.
economy.
     
      Q Larry, you mentioned the Japanese steel exports to the United
States.  Do we believe that Japan is dumping steel in the U.S.?  And
whether you technically call it dumping or not, are we seeing an impact
on our domestic steel industry?
     
      MR. SPERLING:  I don't think there's any question that there has
been a surge of steel imports that have been having a negative impact on
our steel industry and on our steel workers.  There is currently an
anti-dumping case that has been filed against Japan, Russia and Brazil;
as that is a quasi-judicial measure, I don't think it would probably be
appropriate for us to pass judgment on that.
     
      But I think it is appropriate, however, for us to make clear to
any country that it's important that they, in a sense, have their own
house in order and ensure that they are operating by rule-based
measures.  Certainly, in hot rolled steel, you've seen an increase so
far of 200,000 to 1.3 million metric tons; that's a 550 percent
increase.  That certainly is significant -- and a 114 percent increase
in steel overall.  So there's no question that there has been a surge
and that that is certainly causing pain, real pain in some steel
communities in this country.
     
      I think what the President will do when he speaks in Korea and in
Japan is to stress the importance of a rule-based fair trading system
and that the importance of that for maintaining confidence in open
global markets.  And those will be points he will make; those certainly
are points the Vice President made today in his bilateral of Kim
Dae-jung yesterday.
     
      Q Larry, what do you make of the market's unenthusiastic reception
of the Brazil rescue plan?  What does that say about the whole model for
early intervention sort of structure the President has called for?
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  I think we'll have to see how things
play out in Brazil.  I was encouraged by the statement of Mr. Rhodes
after chairing a lunch of major United States banks in New York, that it
was their intention to maintain key commitments to Brazil and have been
encouraged by the pattern of reserve flows in Brazil, which has been
different in November and much more favorable to Brazil than it had been
earlier.  And certainly Brazil's stock market has moved quite
substantially in the last six weeks.
     
      But what will be crucial is not -- obviously the support that is
provided is very important.  But what is most important for the
prospects of maintaining stability and laying a foundation for
resumption of growth in Brazil would be the actions that Brazil takes.
That's why the discussion of fiscal policy in Brazil between President
Cardozo and the Brazilian legislature will be so very important going
forward and certainly we will be watching those, as we expect investors
will, very carefully going forward.
     
      Q Can you answer a question about in consumer terms, that the
average Joe American can understand?  What do you hope to get out of
this trip that's going to impact Americans' lives?  What is your best
hope for this trip that will actually have an impact where people live?
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  A healthier Asian economy, which will
mean higher wages for workers because there will be more demand for U.S.
exports, and better returns for American savers because our markets will
perform better and more stability in the world, which is ultimately
important for the security interests that affect all of us as Americans.
     
      Q Would you grade this one?  Today is the fifth anniversary of
NAFTA, one of the major initiatives of President Clinton.  Would you
give it a grade?
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  I left the classroom some time ago, so
no --
     
      Q Okay, don't give us a grade, give us an overall of what do you
think --
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  So no grades.  But I would say this:  I
think that through a period when there has been a great deal of change
and uncertainty, I think the presence of NAFTA has had a very important
and beneficial interest on -- beneficial impact on U.S. interests.
Without NAFTA, the United States would have substantially fewer exports
to Mexico.  Without NAFTA, our capacity to cooperate with Mexico on
issues ranging from immigration to drugs would be substantially
diminished, and I believe that NAFTA has had an important impact on
maintaining stability in Mexico through a very difficult time.
     
      Q Secretary Summers, when you said that the overall fiscal stance
of Japan in 1998 is less than that of 1996, were you taking into account
the latest stimulus package and are you, therefore, labeling it
insufficient?  And also, do you subscribe to the OECD's forecasts today
that forecast .6 percent growth in Japan as late as the year 2000?
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  I haven't had a chance to review the
OECD's forecasts and their assumption.  The figures I was citing on the
cyclically adjusted deficit for Japan were IMF figures some time ago
referring to 1998.  But the actions taken today would have their primary
impact in 1999, and so I don't think they would lead to a significant
change in the 1998 figures that I was citing for Japanese fiscal policy.
     
      Q Is this stimulus getting more expensive for them as they delay
it?  Would $200 billion have worked last year and it is going to cost
them more if they wait longer?
     
      DEPUTY SECRETARY SUMMERS:  I think as in any financial and
economic problem, as we saw with the S&L crisis in this country, it is
easier to address problems sooner rather than later, and that's why we
have been consistently encouraging stronger policy action.  So,
certainly, the pace with which actions come, as well as the quantity of
those actions, is very important.
     
      MR. LOCKHART:  The President requests all of your presence
upstairs.
     
      Q   Saved by the bell.
     
      Q   Gene, are you on the trip?
     
      MR. SPERLING:  Yes.


Return to Vinnie's Home Page

Return to Clinton Administration Page

Return to Asian Crisis Page

Return to International Trade Page

Return to Global Economy Page