Reiter's research agenda is centered on understanding the effectiveness of policies that reduce violence. These include policies that aim to secure peace where violence is already occurring, as well as those intended to deter or prevent future violence.
Reiter's most recent book Fighting Over Peace: Spoilers, Peace Agreements, and the Strategic Use of Violence (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), explains why some civil war peace agreements are implemented rather peacefully while others come under attack from a variety of violent actors. Furthermore, it shows why these attempts at "spoiling" peace prove successful following some agreements and not others. In examining the conditions under which spoilers arise, and their ultimate impact on peace processes, he uses an original dataset of spoiling following over 300 civil war peace agreements in the post-Cold War era.
Reiter is also a co-founder of the Transitional Justice Data Base Project and a collaborator on the Transitional Justice Research Collaborative, both of which have produced comprehensive, global datasets of trials, truth commissions, amnesties, reparations, and lustration programs used by states over the past four decades to engage past human rights violations. The projects have received funding from a number of sources, including the National Science Foundation, the United States Institute of Peace, and the Smith Richardson Foundation. Stemming from these projects, Reiter is a co-author of a book Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy (United States Institute of Peace Press, 2010), as well as numerous articles and book chapters in such venues as Human Rights Quarterly, International Studies Review, and Journal of Peace Research.
In a third project (with Brett Kyle), Reiter examines the use of military courts to shield armed forces personnel from accountability for human rights abuses. They have published two articles on military courts in Latin America. They are now in the process of writing a book manuscript covering the topic globally.
At Mount Holyoke, Reiter regularly teaches World Politics, Transitional Justice, Political Violence, International Law and Organization, and Ending War and Securing the Peace.
Recent Op-Eds and Media Appearances
- “How to Put ISIS Members On Trial: The Best Way — The Only Real Option — is a New Hybrid International Tribunal,” Arc Digital, July 9, 2019
- "The Crisis in Venezuela," Interview, WGBY's Connecting Point, May 9, 2019
- "Arrest Sudan’s Ousted War Criminal Dictator: Out of Self-Interest, Sudan’s Military Should Turn Over Omar al-Bashir to the International Criminal Court," Arc Digital, April 15, 2019
- "Latin America's Re-Militarization," Jacobin Magazine, November 10, 2018, with Brett J. Kyle (reprint of Militarization Redux)"
- “Brazil’s most popular politician, Lula, won’t be on the October presidential ballot. Here’s what comes next,” Monkey Cage, Washington Post, September 5, 2018, with Brett J. Kyle
- “Militarization Redux: Across the Region, Latin America’s Militaries are Regaining Power through the Court System,” NACLA Report on the Americas, July 27, 2018, with Brett J. Kyle
- “Transitional Justice, the Rule of Law, and Conflict Recurrence,” Development for Peace: Solutions to Tackle Fragility, Conflict, Violence, The World Bank, April 11, 2018, with Laura Bernal-Bermúdez, Chris Mahony, Leigh A. Payne, and Tricia D. Olsen
- “Justice, Cocaine, and Cheese: Colombia’s Rejected Peace Deal,” Share Radio Investment Perspectives (UK), 6 October 2016
- “The Wrong Choice in Colombia: Colombian Voters Made a Mistake by Rejecting a Long-Sought Peace Deal,” U.S. News & World Report, 4 October 2016
- “Colombia and FARC Scramble to Rescue Peace Deal Amid Worries of Return to War,” The Guardian, 3 October 2016
- "Banning Confederate flag just a first step," Op-Ed, Daily Hampshire Gazette, July 9, 2015